Estimation of Quercetin in Mangifera indica Leave Extract by
Planer Chromatographic Method
Jahanvi Soni, Chintan Patel, Avni Solanki, Jinal Tandel*, Heta Kachhiya
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Analysis,
Indukaka Ipcowala College of Pharmacy, New V.V. Nagar, Anand.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: jinal.tandel@cvmu.edu.in
ABSTRACT:
Mangifera indica L. belongs to family Anacardiaceae is an important herb in ayurvedic and indigenous medical systems for over 4000 to treat numbers of diseases like Diabetes, Dissolve gall and kidney stones, cures respiratory problems, treat throat problems, treat restlessness, treat hiccups, helps to lose weight and also heals burns. A sensitive, simple, and accurate High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic method has been used for quantitation of Quercetin from of Mango Leaf powder. Phytochemical Screening was performed to identify various chemical constituents present in the plant. The chromatographic development was done on HPTLC plates recoated with Silica Gel 60 F254 utilizing a mobile phase of Toluene: Ethyl Acetate: Formic acid (4: 5: 1 %v/v/v) as flexible stage. The eluted analytes detected at 374 nm. Phytochemical screening gives promising data for presence of various chemical constituents like, Alkaloids, Flavonoids, Glycosides, Steroids, Glycosides, Proteins, Tannins and Phenolic Compounds, Volatile oil etc. In developed HPTLC method quercetin was found at 0.84 Rf as compared with standard Quercetin. Present study confirms the presence of various chemical constituents in the leaf of Mangifera indica. Also, it confirms the presence of Quercetin in different extract of Mangifera indica leaves. Highest concentration of Quercetin was found in ethyl acetate extract where lowest amount was found in ether extract.
INTRODUCTION:
![]()
![]()
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) belongs
to family Anacardiaceae is an important herb in ayurvedic and indigenous
medical systems for over 4000 years1. The mango tree is
an evergreen that is well-known for its mouthwatering fruits as well as its
many traditional medical applications. The cultivation of mangoes produces a
lot of agricultural residue, including leaves, flowers, stems, and bark while
trimming, in addition to its commercially valued fruit, which presents disposal
issues for farmers Mango leaves are a rich source of essential
minerals, including nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, iron, sodium, calcium, and
magnesium, as well as vitamins A, B, E, and C. The primary bio-macromolecule in
mango leaves is protein, making them a viable alternative feed source for
livestock in developing countries, thereby helping to mitigate food shortages.
Mangiferin is the main biologically active component of mango leaves, with
phenolic acids, benzophenones, and other antioxidants such flavonoids,
carotenoids, isoquercetin, quercetin, ascorbic acid, and tocopherols. Mango
leaves are known for their various biological, pharmacological, and
phytochemical characteristics. They have been shown to have immunomodulatory,
antidiabetic, antioxidant, and antibacterial activities1-4.
Among the most notable is quercetin, a plant pigment and powerful flavonoid antioxidant. Quercetin is a flavonol that has antiviral, antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, anticarcinogenic, and antidiabetic qualities. This lipophilic chemical offers defense against neurodegenerative illnesses by effortlessly passing through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Quercetin has been shown to be a useful therapeutic drug for neurodegeneration, diabetes, cancer, and inflammation in a number of in vivo and in vitro investigations. Studies have indicated that quercetin plays a major role in the prevention of illnesses associated with aging5,6.
Presence of quercetin in mango leaves gives clarity about the use of mango leaves in various disease. Further isolation can be carried out to identify pharmacological role of quercetin in Mangifera indica The present study focuses on the phytochemical screening along with the qualitative analysis of Quercetin in the Mangifera indica L. HPTLC method has not been reported for optimization of Quercetin in Mango leaves in any reputed journal. Structure of Quercetin is shown in figure 1.
Figure. 1: Chemical Structure of Quercetin
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials:
Preparation of mango leaves powder:
Mango leaves were collected from the mango tress of botanical garden, New Vallabh Vidyanagar, GIDC, Anand, Gujarat 388121. The leaves were dried in shadow. They were powdered using a mechanical mixture and was stored in container at room temperature.’
Identification of mango leave:
The Mango species used in this study was identified and approved by botanist, New V.V. Nagar, Anand, Gujarat.
Preparation of extract:
Dried powder was weighed accurately and prepared six different extracts first treated with hexane to remove chlorophyll and then different extract were prepared using six solvents (diethyl ether, ethyl acetate, methanol, chloroform, ether and hydro-alcoholic (70:30)) extraction was done by two different methods i.e.; maceration and decoction. For qualitative analysis, 10mg of Quercetin powder was transferred in volumetric flask and make up the volume upto 10ml with methanol.
Preliminary phytochemical evaluation:7-9
Coarse powder of the dried leaves was prepared using a mechanical grinder. For maceration 10g mango leaf powder was weighed and treated with 100ml hexane solution. After 24 hours all flask were filtered and residue were treated with different solvent (diethyl ether, ethyl acetate, methanol, chloroform, ether and hydro-alcoholic (70:30 %v/v)) for further extraction process. All flask is kept for 72 hours in dark place at room temperature with occasional shaking. After 72 hours’ flask was filtered and kept the filtrate for evaporation process to collect mass of extract4. Same process was followed for decoction method but it was heat for 30 min. before filtration. The extract was used for the preliminary phytochemical screening. Tests for the various phytoconstituents such as alkaloids, steroids, carbohydrate, glycosides, flavonoids etc were carried out by using standard pharmacopeial procedures.
HPTLC method development:10-11
Chemical and Reagents:
Analytically pure Quercetin was obtained from Euca enterprise, India. Toluene HPLC Grade from S D Fine - Chem Ltd., Mumbai India, Ethyl acetate from Suvidhinath Laboratories, Gujarat India, Formic acid from Suvidhinath Laboratories, Gujarat India, Methanol HPLC Grade from– SRL Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai India.
Instrument:
Sample application has been carried out with help of Hamilton syringe 100μl syringe which give 6mm bands width using Camag Linomat 5 (Switzerland) sample applicator on pre-coated silica gel aluminium plate 60 F254, (10 cm x 10 cm with 0.2 mm thickness, E. Merck, Germany). Camag TLC scanner is used for the densitometry scanning of the developed chromatogram. To ensure accuracy, all drugs and chemicals were weighed on a Mettler Toledo electronic balance (ME 204, Mettler Toledo group, Mumbai, India).
Chromatographic Condition:
Sample application- Standard Quercetin and different extract of M.Indica was applied on the HPTLC plates in the form of narrow bands of 6 mm length, 10 mm from the bottom and left edge, and with 9 mm space between two bands. Samples application has been carried out under a continuous drying stream of nitrogen gas.
Mobile phase development:
After so many trials on single as well as in different composition of various solvent, i.e. benzene, methanol, water, toluene, ethyl acetate, chloroform, butanol Toluene: Ethyl Acetate: Formic acid (4: 5: 1 %v/v/v) were selected as mobile phase for chromatographic development. Plates were developed using a mobile phase consisting of Toluene: Ethyl Acetate: Formic acid (4: 5: 1 %v/v) Linear ascending development was carried out in a twin-trough glass chamber equilibrated through chamber saturation with the mobile phase vapours for 40 min at 25 ºC ± 2 ºC. 10 ml of the mobile phase (5 ml in the trough containing the plate and 5 ml in the other trough) was used for each development and was allowed to migrate a distance of 80 mm. Once development was over, the HPTLC plates were dried completely.
RESULT:
Phytochemical screening:
Different extract of M.Indica were used to identify various phytoconstituent using phytochemical screening method as shown in Table 1.
High performance thin layer chromatography:
HPTLC method development was achieved with mobile phase Toluene: Ethyl Acetate: Formic acid (4:5:1% v/v) which gives optimum result of quercetin with 0.84 Rf value as shown in figure 2.
Figure. 2: Photograph of TLC plate with Toluene: Ethyl Acetate: Formic acid (4: 5: 1%v/v/v)
Selection of detection wavelength:
The solution was applied in the form of band in concentration 400 – 2000ng/band for quercetin was prepared in methanol. The plate was developed using Toluene: Ethyl Acetate: Formic acid (4:5:1%v/v) and dried in air. After development of TLC plate was scanned in the UV region 200 – 400nm and overlay spectrum was recorded using Camag TLC Scanner 4. The spectra showed the maximum drug absorbance at 374nm. The spectra of Quercetin show promising absorbance for Quercetin at 374nm. (figure 3)
Table 1: Phytochemical Analysis of Mangifera indica leaves by Maceration(M) and Decoction(D)
|
No. |
Chemical Constitute |
H2O |
Methanol |
Ether |
Chloroform |
Ethyl Acetate |
Hydro-Alcoholic (70:30) |
||||||
|
M |
D |
M |
D |
M |
D |
M |
D |
M |
D |
M |
D |
||
|
1 |
Alkaloids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
2 |
Carbohydrates |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Calcium |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
4 |
Chloride |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
5 |
Carbonate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
6 |
Fats and Oils (Fixed Oil) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
7 |
Flavonoids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
8 |
Glycosides |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
9 |
Iron |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
10 |
Magnesium |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
11 |
Nitrates |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
12 |
Phosphates |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
13 |
Potassium |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
14 |
Proteins |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
15 |
Steroids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
16 |
Sulphate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
17 |
Tannins and Phenolic Compound |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
18 |
Volatile Oils |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Figure. 3: UV Spectra of Quercetin
Quantification of quercetin in various extract:
Calibration curve of Quercetin was prepared in the concentration range 400 – 2000ng/band. Densitogram and 3D Chromatogram were shown in figure 4. calibration curve was plotted which shows linear response of the quercetin (figure 5). Data was shown in table 2. With help of regression equation of quercetin from the calibration data, concentration of quercetin in different extract of Leave of M.indica were calculated based on the absorbance value. % of amount of quercetin were shown in table 3.
Figure. 4: HPTLC Chromatogram of Calibration Curve of Quercetin
From the regression equation concentration of quercetin was found in different extract which was indicate that highest concentration was found in ethyl acetate extract were lowest concentration was found in ether extract. (figure 6) (table 3)
Figure. 5: Calibration curve of Quercetin
Table 2: Calibration curve of Quercetin
|
Sr. No. |
Concentration (ng/band) |
Peak Area (AU) (n=5) |
±SD |
%RSD |
|
1 |
400 |
4331.8 |
50.11347 |
1.156874 |
|
2 |
800 |
6360.06 |
70.70088 |
1.111639 |
|
3 |
1200 |
8223.32 |
84.74013 |
1.030486 |
|
4 |
1600 |
9719.86 |
97.34721 |
1.001529 |
|
5 |
2000 |
11476.28 |
117.8446 |
1.026854 |
Figure. 6: HPTLC Chromatogram of different extract with Quercetin
Table 3: Quantitative Analysis of Quercetin
|
Extract Concentration (2000 ng/band) |
Peak Area (AU) |
Concentration found (ng/band) |
% Quercetin |
|
Methanol |
1501.2 |
856.26 |
42.81 |
|
Ethyl acetate |
2146.5 |
1501.56 |
75.08 |
|
Ether |
671.7 |
26.76 |
1.34 |
|
Diethyl ether |
2135.7 |
1490.76 |
74.54 |
|
Chloroform |
1206.2 |
561.26 |
28.06 |
|
Hydro: Alcoholic (70:30) |
795.8 |
150.86 |
7.54 |
|
Quercetin |
2600.2 |
1955.26 |
97.76 |
DISCUSSION:
The present study involved testing of phytochemical compounds and development of HPTLC method for Mangifera indica leaves.
Phytochemical Testing:
The phytochemical tests should that after maceration and decoction the test for Alkaloids, Flavonoids, Glycosides, Steroids, Glycosides, Proteins, Tannins and Phenolic Compounds, Volatile oils were present also Carbohydrates, Fats and Oil (Fixed Oil) were absent in the extracts.
HPTLC Method:
The HPTLC Method was developed using mobile phase Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid (4: 5: 1%v/v/v) and stationary phase pre-coated silica gel G60-F254 aluminum sheet at 374nm. The Rf value was found to 0.84. The quercetin was found to be 42.81%, 75.08%, 1.34%, 74.54%, 28.06%, 7.54% and 97.76% in Methanol, Ethyl acetate, Ether, Diethyl ether, Chloroform, Hydro: Alcoholic (70:30), Quercetin respectively.
The highest percentage was found in Ethyl acetate i.e.; 75.08% and the lowest was found in Ether i.e.; 1.34%
CONCLUSION:
Mangifera indica contain various chemical marker which are responsible for their action in various disease. Study found that quercetin is present in all different solvent extract which give Rf value 0.84 in HPTLC. During the estimation it was found that ethyl acetate extract contain quercetin in higher concentration and ether extract in lower concentration. Further study can be carried out to importance of quercetin in Mangifera indica leaf used in various diseases.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The authors would like to thank Indukaka Ipcowala College of Pharmacy for providing necessary requirement to carry out this research study.
REFERENCES:
1. K.A.Shah, M.B. Patel, R.J. Patel and P.K. Parmar. Mangifera indica (Mango). Pharmacogn Rev. 2010; 4(7): 42-48
2. Kumar M, Vivek Saurabh. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Leaves: Nutritional Composition, Phytochemical Profile, and Health – Promoting Bioactivities. Antioxidants and Biological Properties of Plant Extract. 2011; 10(2): 299
3. Lybrate. Benefits of Mango Leaves and its Side Effects. Oct 2021; https://www.lybrate.com/topic/mango-leaves-benefits. Dec 2021
4. Gupta A., Tandon N. Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal Plants. 2005; 3: 29-36
5. Deepika, Maurya P.K., Health Benefits of Quercetin in Age-Related Diseases. Molecule,2022; 27(8): 2498
6. A.V.A. David, R. Arulmoli, S. Parasuraman. Overviews of Biological Importance of Quercetin: A Bioactive Flavonoid. Pharmacognosy Review. 2016; 10(20): 84-89.
7. Khandelwal K. Practical Pharmacognosy. Nirali Prakshan. 2008; Pune. pp 149-156
8. J.N. Tandel, R.V. Bhatt, N.M. Patel, S.K. Shah. Practical Implication of Stability Indicating Chromatographic Method for Estimation of Clomipramine Hydrochloride and its Related Substance from Capsule Dosage Form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2017; 7(2): 100-112.
9. N.S. Dinge, N.S. Pattan, S.A. Nirmal, et. al. A Review on Phytochemical and Pharmacological Profile of Cassia tora Linn. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2009; 1(3): 173-176
10. Nikhat F, D Satyanarayana, Subhramanyam EVS. Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Indian Medicinal Plants Zizyphus Mauritiana Lamk. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2009; 1(1):5-10
11. V. Madhan Chakkaravarthy, Venkataraman Kumar. HPTLC Finger Print Analysis of Steroid, Flavonoid and Antiradical activity in Sargassum wightii from Gulf of Mannar. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2011; 3(2): 72-74
12. A. K. Meena, A. Sinha, S. C. Verma, M. D. Gupta, M. M. Padhi. HPTLC Profile of Important Indian Spices used in Ayurvedic Formulations. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2013; 5(4):188-193
|
Received on 22.04.2024 Revised on 09.12.2024 Accepted on 14.05.2025 Published on 06.10.2025 Available online from October 13, 2025 Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2025; 15(4):374-378. DOI: 10.52711/2231-5691.2025.00058 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|